Lankysudanese
4276
So are you telling me this watch can ACTUALLY withstand water down to a depth of 30m?
Apr 18, 2024,04:37 AM
Looking at the thinness of the case and the non-screw crown, I don’t believe it. PP better tread carefully.
Just me 2 cents
Comments:
view entire thread
Aquanaut :: Nautilus 30 m thoughts
By: Revilo : April 17th, 2024-21:43
At least in my mind, Patek has a history of shunning the norm and taking their own direction (like when they left the Geneve seal standard to create their own PP seal, which is completely without outside accountability, when you think about it, but nobody...
Exactly
By: blau : April 18th, 2024-14:06
The idea that we ought to feel equally comfortable submerging into the ocean both that watch and an Aquanaut is ridiculous, and does more to cast doubt on the Aquanaut than it does increase confidence in a Calatrava.
Thank you, all for indulging
By: Revilo : April 18th, 2024-16:50
Precisely, this is why I made the suggestion that they can distinguish in their marketing by using Waterproof (Naut/Aqua) vs. Water Resistant (Calatrava, etc.). Just a thought.
It's semantics, but actually misleading
By: piccolochimico (aka dsgalaxy1) : April 18th, 2024-04:44
The pressure of water is not static, either you swim or you have a shower. How do I see the new WR 30 m Aquanaut QUARTZ? A great move, because nobody cares!